LiftPace

How 1-rep-max formulas work (Epley vs Brzycki)

By LiftPace Editorial · 2026-05-28

In short: Both formulas estimate your single-rep max from a multi-rep set. Epley: 1RM = weight × (1 + reps ÷ 30). Brzycki: 1RM = weight × 36 ÷ (37 − reps). They agree closely at low reps; Epley reads higher and Brzycki lower as reps climb. Use a set of 10 reps or fewer for a reliable estimate, then load training percentages from it.

You rarely need to actually attempt a true one-rep max — it is risky and unnecessary for most lifters. Instead you can estimate it from a normal set using a prediction formula. The two classics are Epley and Brzycki.

The answer first

Both formulas turn a multi-rep set into an estimated single-rep max:

Epley:   1RM = weight × (1 + reps / 30)
Brzycki: 1RM = weight × 36 / (37 − reps)

Enter your set into the one-rep-max calculator and it shows both, plus a loading table. Use a set of 10 reps or fewer taken close to failure for the best estimate.

A worked example

Say you bench 100 kg for 5 clean reps:

FormulaCalculationEstimated 1RM
Epley100 × (1 + 5/30)116.7 kg
Brzycki100 × 36 / (37 − 5)112.5 kg

The two are about 4 kg apart at 5 reps. At 2–3 reps they would be almost identical; at 10 reps the gap widens. Many lifters simply average the two, which the calculator also reports.

Why use fewer reps

The fewer reps in your test set, the smaller the extrapolation and the more accurate the estimate. A heavy triple predicts your max far better than a set of 15, because by 15 reps your performance is limited by muscular endurance and technique breakdown rather than pure strength. As a rule, trust estimates from 1–6 reps, treat 7–10 as decent, and ignore anything above ~12.

Turning 1RM into training weights

The point of knowing your max is choosing working weights. The standard percentage-of-1RM relationship looks like this:

% of 1RMReps ≈Typical use
100%1True max
90%4Strength
85%6Strength/hypertrophy
80%8Hypertrophy
75%10Hypertrophy/volume
70%12Volume

See the full % of 1RM reference table. From our 116.7 kg estimate, an 80% hypertrophy set would be about 93 kg for 8 reps.

Practical tips

Bottom line

Epley and Brzycki are both good; the difference between them is smaller than your day-to-day variation. Pick one (or average them), keep your test sets short, and use the result to program sensible training percentages.

This is general fitness information, not individualised coaching or medical advice.

Frequently asked questions

Are Epley and Brzycki accurate?

Within the 1–10 rep range they are accurate enough for programming and agree closely at low reps. Beyond about 10–12 reps, fatigue and technique reduce accuracy, so keep the test set short.

Why do the two formulas disagree at high reps?

They model the rep-to-load relationship differently. Epley is linear and keeps adding load per rep, so it climbs higher; Brzycki's denominator shrinks toward zero near 37 reps, which also inflates it, but in the practical range Brzycki reads slightly lower than Epley.

How do I use my estimated 1RM?

Multiply it by a training percentage: 85–100% for strength, about 67–85% for hypertrophy, below 67% for endurance. The one-rep-max calculator prints a full loading table in your units.

Related articles

Last updated: 2026-05-28